Transit Empty Weight

FORD TRANSIT WEIGHT AS DELIVERED.
That’s specific to the High-Roof, Extended-Length cargo van.
Source: http://www.caranddriver.com/ford/transit/specs/2016/transit-van/377592

lbs

Conversion Added Weight

THAT’S THE ADDED WEIGHT FROM THE CONVERSION. Includes everything from our Build Journal: all permanent structure and all permanent appliances (fridge, range, etc). Excludes humans. Empty fresh water tank & fuel tank.

lbs

Payload Weight

THAT’S THE PAYLOAD when hitting the road at Day 1 of The Ride. Excludes the conversion added weight. Includes all humans (2), full fresh water tank, full gas tank, summer & winter gear, food (a lot), etc, etc

lbs

Faroutvan Total Weight

THAT’S THE VAN, THE CONVERSION & THE PAYLOAD. As weighted when hitting the road at Day 1 of The Ride. Includes all humans, full fresh water tank, full gas tank, summer & winter gear, food, etc, etc

lbs

On Second Thought

Conversion Added Weight + Payload Weight = 3500 lbs. That’s the max payload capacity of our Transit (Extended Length, High Roof, T250, 3.7L Engine)! We didn’t expect to be carrying that much; we will re-weight the van after a while because we left with much stuff than needed (food and misc) when emptying the house.

For sure, we’re glad we installed the Air Lift Suspension a few weeks ago:

AirLift-Video-Image Fallback

6 comments

  1. Comment by Wes Greenwood

    Wes Greenwood Reply August 17, 2017 at 9:48 am

    How’s the 3.7l engine doing at almost max weight?

    It was something I was curious about when looking at vans.

    • Comment by Antoine

      Antoine Reply August 17, 2017 at 10:36 am

      The route to Platsburg was pretty flat, so the engine was just fine hehe!
      Future will tell…

      • Comment by Terence Moores

        Terence Moores Reply December 6, 2017 at 12:15 pm

        Are you still have with the 3.7L with your payload or would you now opt for the Eco Boost?

        • Comment by Antoine

          Antoine Reply December 6, 2017 at 2:41 pm

          If we would live on the east coast (rather flat), we would still opt for the 3.7. For the west coast, eco boost…

  2. Comment by Aaron Traxinger

    Aaron Traxinger Reply August 18, 2017 at 10:40 am

    I am not planning on the full range/stove (just a simple 2 burner top) and our batteries should be lighter but you have be wondering if I should save up an additional $1200 to bump the payload up to 4120 from the 3620 on the Ecoboost. Also which rear axle did you get? I am a Tacoma guy and love to get lost in there forums. When ever guys up there tire size they tend to re-gear to a bigger ratio to overcome some power loss. I plan to just stick with the 3.31 for the sake of mpgs but thought I would ask. Its not like I am putting 33 inch tires on it 🙂

    • Comment by Antoine

      Antoine Reply August 18, 2017 at 4:11 pm

      We have the 4.10; that was our only choice with the 3.7 engine and High-Roof Extended Length van.

      We can definitely feel the weight while driving (acceleration, stop, curves) but it’s very manageable.

      P.S. Just dropped you an email

      Cheers!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Go top